Loading
Qrypt Protocol · Post-quantum security intelligence
Understand cryptographic exposure. Assess onchain assets. Prepare for a quantum-resistant future.
01The threat
Every onchain signature today relies on mathematics that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could undo. That machine does not exist yet. Understanding where the dependency sits is the first step in preparing for it.
Accounts sign with elliptic-curve keys. Computing a public key from a private key is fast. Reversing it — the discrete logarithm problem — is infeasible for any classical computer.
Shor's algorithm solves discrete logarithms efficiently, but only on a large, error-corrected quantum computer. No such machine exists today, and no blockchain can currently be broken this way. The exposure is long-term — which is why migration work has already begun.
Standards such as ML-DSA and SLH-DSA rest on problems with no known efficient quantum attack. The cost is size: signatures are tens of times larger, making adoption a multi-year engineering transition rather than a switch.
02Introducing Qrypt
Qrypt analyzes the security properties of tokens on Solana, and of tokens, wallets and smart contracts on Robinhood Chain — and reports what it found, what it could not verify, and how confident it is.
01
Tokens enter the index once they are trading: from the most-traded ranking on Solana, and from launchpad events and pool creation on Robinhood Chain. Metadata and liquidity evidence come first.
02
Deterministic rules examine Solana mint and freeze authorities, contract permissions, liquidity, holder distribution and deployer history. Every finding carries its evidence.
03
Watched assets are reassessed as evidence changes. Alerts explain which rule changed — never just that a number moved.
04Security assessment
A security score, a quantum-readiness status and an assessment confidence — reported separately, each traceable to the evidence behind it. The example below uses demonstration data.
Contract risks
Contract Security · 35%
83
Owner can mint up to a hard-coded supply cap.
Liquidity risks
Liquidity Security · 25%
69
$187,000 across detected pools.
Holder concentration
Holder Distribution · 20%
83
Largest holder controls 12% of supply.
Deployer history
Deployer Reputation · 20%
33
3 prior deployments with high-severity findings.
05Quantum landscape
Signature schemes, dependencies and publicly known migration work. Statuses describe evidence — there are no readiness scores here.
Ed25519Accounts and validators
Ed25519 keys double as account addresses
SHA-256 hashing
Optional hash-based one-time-signature vault program (Winternitz Vault)
Reported testnet experiments with post-quantum signatures
ECDSA · secp256k1Account transactions
EVM account model and transaction format
Arbitrum-based layer 2: inherits settlement and data security from Ethereum
Keccak-256 hashing
No chain-specific post-quantum initiative identified in the public sources reviewed.
ECDSA · secp256k1Account transactions
BLS12-381Validator attestations
KZG polynomial commitments for blob data
Pairing-based cryptography in consensus
Keccak-256 and SHA-256 hashing
Ethereum Foundation post-quantum programme (pq.ethereum.org)
Hash-based signature research for consensus
Account abstraction as a route to alternative signature schemes
Based on public sources, last reviewed October 2026.Quantum intelligence
06Autonomous agents
Agents act faster than people can review. A structured assessment — versioned, timestamped, with evidence references — gives an agent’s risk policy something concrete to evaluate before it signs.
01
AI Agent
Proposes a transaction
02
Qrypt Assessment
Score · quantum status · confidence
03
Risk Policy
Rules set by the operator
04
Transaction Decision
Proceed, hold or reject
PlannedPay-per-request access through x402 is a planned integration. The API is not yet publicly available.
Developer platform03Live intelligence
| Asset | ScoreSecurity Score |
|---|---|
| USD CoinUSDC · EPjFWd…Dt1v | N/AUnknown |
| SpaceX - Backpack SecuritiesSPCX · SPCXxc…imGb | N/AUnknown |
| PumpPUMP · pumpCm…9Dfn | 64Moderate risk |
| Coinbase Wrapped BTCcbBTC · cbbtcf…iMij | N/AUnknown |
| STRKSTRK · HsRpHQ…SCoz | 43High risk |
| Asset | ScoreSecurity Score |
|---|---|
| PapertradePAPER · 0x00bb…129a | N/AUnknown |
| CapitalAnchorCPANC · 0x67D7…5dAD | 100Moderate risk |
| PapertradePaper · 0x139d…E47F | N/AUnknown |
| Chinchilla ChillCHNCHL · 0x3d49…b5A5 | N/AUnknown |
| Quantum InuQI · 0xb862…783b | N/AUnknown |
On Solana, which tokens are trending comes from Jupiter; every finding is read from the chain. A numeric score appears only where at least half the model has evidence. Tokens with non-standard contracts show N/A alongside their real findings.